Legal Opinion
Cyphers Ex Rel. Rohm v. Fuji Heavy Industries Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 18, 1998No. CV 97-186-M-DWMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MOLLOY, District Judge.
Ordinarily a motion pro hac vice is granted pro forma. Not here. Richard Bowman wants to appear in this case pro hac vice. The plaintiff and her lawyers, to put it euphemistically, strenuously resist. The motion pro hac vice is denied as it pertains to the law firm of Bowman and Brooke. The individual request of Richard Bowman is dealt with below.
I. Facts
I have been provided evidence about the litigation “practices” of some lawyers in the Bowman and Brooke law firm. Magistrate Judge Robert Holter testified that the firm did not promote the orderly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Livingston v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.District Court, D. Montana · 1995
- Jochims v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
- Delvecchio v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.