Legal Opinion

Claim of Hill v. Thompson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated (see 91 AD2d 1082).

The evidence concerning whether the claimant comes within the exclusion from employment status set forth in subdivision 4 of section 2 of the Workers’ Compensation Law is undisputed and the inferences drawn by the Workers’ Compensation Board from these facts are conclusive on the courts if supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Axel v Duffy-Mott Co., 47 NY2d 1, 6). We find substantial evidence before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Axel v. Duffy-Mott Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Claim of Hill v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Cerami v. City of Rochester Sch. Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Leggio v. Suffolk County Police DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Ribar v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API