Legal Opinion
Davenport v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 13, 2000No. 99-2099PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Joseph F. Davenport timely filed a § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence raising four claims. After the AEDPA’s one-year deadline, Davenport filed an amended § 2255 motion raising three new claims. The district court found that the three new claims did not relate back under Rule 15(c) to the date of Davenport’s original § 2255 motion and thus were barred by the AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1991, Davenport received a 234-month prison sentence after a jury convicted him of two drug offenses. 1 In 1992, this Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Anthony Alexander Pittman, A/K/A Anthony Alexander Pittman, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Michael Lloyd CraycraftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Clinton Duffus A/K/A "Paul Lewis, Beanie" Clinton DuffusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Richard Joseph Lynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Michael Anthony v. Steven Cambra, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- J.B. Farris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Marlandow Jeffries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.