Legal Opinion

Parkhouse v. Stringer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*663OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

Petitioner’s testimony at a public hearing before a New York City agency prompted a complaint by a public official, followed by a subpoena to petitioner from the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI). Petitioner seeks to quash the subpoena, claiming that it exceeds DOI’s investigative authority and interferes with her First Amendment rights.

We recognize the importance of protecting citizens who speak publicly to their government from intrusion and harassment that may result from official displeasure with what they say. In this case, therefore, we apply…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Evergreen Assn., Inc. v. SchneidermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Downs v. Town of GuilderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics v. Campaign for One New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hyatt v. California Franchise Tax BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Hyatt v. California Franchise Tax BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API