Legal Opinion
International Nav. Co. v. Sea Ins.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 14, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Admiralty. Action on marine policy of insurance.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
The question is whether an English insurance policy on a vessel should bear, the expenses arising from stranding in the ratio of the loss to the actual value, which is the English rule (Balmoral Company, Ltd., v. Marten, 2 Q. B. [1900] 748, affirmed in Court of Appeals, L. R. 2 K. B. [1901] 896, affirmed in House of Lords, L. R. App. Cases [1902] 511), or in the ratio of the loss to the policy value, according to the rule at New York, the port of discharge (International Navigation Company v. Atlantic Mutual Ins. Company [D. C.] 100 Fed. 304, affirmed in 108 Fed. 987,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Nav. Co. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- International Nav. Co. v. The St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Porter v. BlairU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- British & Foreign Marine Ins. v. Maldonado & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Monsen v. AmsinckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1908