Legal Opinion

People v. Horton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1981No. Docket 78-827PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After Remand

Before: Bronson, P.J., and D. C. Riley, and E. A. Quinnell, * JJ. Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to a charge of breaking and entering a place of business contrary to MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305 and of being a fourth felony offender contrary to MCL 769.12; MSA 28.1084. The transcripts of three of four of defendant’s appearances in court could not be produced. The missing transcripts included both plea-taking proceedings. In People v Horton, 95 Mich App 561; 291 NW2d 121 (1980), which provides a detailed statement of what occurred in this matter, we remanded this cause so that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FrechetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. CarsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. DrewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. DunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. HortonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FedericoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Elazier v. DETROIT NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People of Michigan v. Myron DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People of Michigan v. Rotana Roshonn HughleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. People of Michigan v. Tommie Lee CraigMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API