Legal Opinion
Frey v. Poynor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 9, 1962No. 39370PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.
The judgment challenged in this appeal enforces, as a “restrictive covenant”, a provision of a deed to lots 6 and 7, Block 13, of the Garland Addition to the City of Enid, by permanently enjoining the plaintiffs in error, and all persons claiming by, through or under them, from constructing or maintaining a filling station thereon.
The lots involved are the only ones in the Addition that have never had a permanent structure on them. They were platted in, and as a part of, said Addition on or about May 11, 1907, by Messrs. C. E. Gannon and 'S. R. Marshall, and a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Bauby v. KrasowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Southwest Petroleum Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Weaver v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- West Alameda Heights Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Crowell v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Livesay v. Shoreline, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001