Legal Opinion
Bialkowski v. Bor. of Ridgefield
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 N.J. Super. 194 (1972)
293 A.2d 671
GENE M. BIALKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
v.
BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND GEORGE CALZA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 20, 1972.
Decided June 28, 1972.
Before Judges LABRECQUE, KOLOVSKY and ALLCORN.
Ms. Sylvia B. Pressler argued the cause for the appellant (Okin, Pressler & Shapiro, attorneys).
Mr. Michael L. Scherby argued the cause for the respondents.
2Per curiam
Under the provisions of N.J.S.A. 40:87-15, the borough council was authorized to appoint, in addition to…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Auto-Rite Supply Co. v. Mayor of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Greenfield v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Allgaier v. Township of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
4Cited by7 opinions
- In Re FitzgeraldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Muccio v. CroninNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Smith v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF BERGEN CTYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Roe v. Borough of Upper Saddle RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Viviani v. Borough of BogotaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.