Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Metros v. United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1970No. 432-70Published

1ConcurrenceHolloway, Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment and the holding of the majority that the writ must issue to protect the privilege against disclosure of the identity of the confidential informer. To me the compelling considerations on the privilege are a sufficient basis for relief and I cannot agree that the principles of collateral estoppel apply under Federal or Colorado law on the record before us.

To me the limitations on collateral estoppel prevent its application here. “It is well established that a prior criminal conviction may work an estoppel in favor of the Government in a subsequent civil proceeding.”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Hernandez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API