Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Bell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 11, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Complaint for land. Before Judge Hammond. Burke superior court.' May 27, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. Where depositions sued out under the Civil Code, §5316, have been executed and returned to the court, as prescribed in the Civil Code, §5317, the same are not inadmissible because not signed by the witness, or because it does not affirmatively appear from, the commissioner’s certificate thereto that he was a sworn offioer.

2. Where the question under investigation is whether or not a deed was delivered, it is not error to allow a witness, who states that he was present at the time of its execution, to testify: “It [the deed] was signed and sealed, and to the best of my belief it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Brinkley v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Futch v. JarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Mathis v. SolomonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Crockett v. CassselsSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Newton v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API