Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Marchesseault

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 7, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

There was substantially no dispute as to the facts which are material to a consideration of this appeal. The plaintiff was riding in a car, owned by her and operated by her husband, in a northerly direction on Main Street in the village of Moosup, which is a paved street twenty-four feet wide. Church Street intersects Main Street from the west and has a traveled surface eighteen feet in width, south of which there is a shoulder of grass or grass and gravel about five and a half feet wide extending to a hedge which marks the property line on the south. The plaintiff’s car was following the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. WaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Andrew v. White Bus Line CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Miller v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ballou v. Jewett City Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Nettles v. Home Oil Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1940
  3. Ustjanauskas v. GuilianoConnecticut Superior Court · 1966
  4. Ortiz v. City of Bridgeport, No. Cv93 30 46 43 S (Mar. 17, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API