Legal Opinion

Bloor v. Dansker

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 19, 1980No. MDL No. 290 (WCC); No. 76 Civ. 4679 (WCC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CONNER, District Judge:

This action is before the Court on objections filed by defendants Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. and Jerome Lowengrub, a partner in Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. purportedly named as representative of a defendant class of all Peat Marwick partners (collectively “PMM”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), to the Recommended Decision of Magistrate Harold J. Raby, Report No. 19 submitted April 20, 1979, on PMM’s motion for partial judgment of dismissal on the pleadings or for partial summary judgment.

Plaintiff James Bloor (“Trustee”), Chapter X Trustee for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Investors Funding Corp., Etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  2. Bloor v. Dansker (In Re Investors Funding Corp. of New York Securities Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Pieciak v. Crowe LLPDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API