Legal Opinion

United States v. Van Rijk

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 2001No. 99-35514; D.C. CV-98-00068-WLDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM2

Ivan Van Rijk (“Van Rijk”), a professional jeweler, appeals the district court’s judgment of forfeiture of 847 pieces of jewelry and 370 precious stones valued at $394,000. Van Rijk attempted to transport this merchandise across the border into the United States from Canada without declaring it.

The government seeks forfeiture of the merchandise pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1497.3 Van Rijk concedes that he violated federal laws requiring that he declare the jewelry and precious stones at the border. Rijk contends, however, that the government’s demand that he forfeit $394,000 worth of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 171, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 211 United States of America v. $273,969.04 U.S. Currency, and Regina A. Puzo, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API