Miller v. State

Benham, Chief Justice.

In this appeal from his conviction of murder, Jamel Miller argues only that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction because his confession was not adequately corroborated.

When arrested within two days of the shooting, Miller confessed to shooting the victim as a contract killing. He said that the victim’s wife, a co-indictee, offered him $1,500 to kill her husband; that they entered into a signed contract to that effect; that the victim’s wife supplied the murder weapon; and that the other co-indictee drove the car in which Miller…