Legal Opinion

People v. Carr

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2010No. 50PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

A party seeking a missing witness instruction has the burden of making the request “as soon as practicable” (People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428 [1986]). Whether such a request is timely is a question to be decided by the trial court in its discretion, taking into account both when the requesting party knew or should have known that a basis for a missing witness charge existed, and any prejudice that may have been suffered by the other party as a result of the delay.

Here, defendant knew at the outset of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. BoddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Carr v. GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
  5. People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API