People v. Carr
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
A party seeking a missing witness instruction has the burden of making the request “as soon as practicable” (People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428 [1986]). Whether such a request is timely is a question to be decided by the trial court in its discretion, taking into account both when the requesting party knew or should have known that a basis for a missing witness charge existed, and any prejudice that may have been suffered by the other party as a result of the delay.
Here, defendant knew at the outset of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BoddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Carr v. GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.