Legal Opinion

Niesent v. Homestake Mining Co. of California

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1993No. 17933, 18009Published

1Opinion of the Court

505 N.W.2d 781 (1993)

Richard NIESENT, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, Defendant and Appellee.

Nos. 17933, 18009.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued February 8, 1993.

Decided September 15, 1993.

Jane Wipf Pfeifle of Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun, Rapid City, for appellant.

A.P. Fuller and Brad P. Gordon of Fuller & Tellinghuisen, Lead, for appellee.

TIMM, Circuit Judge.

Richard Niesent (Niesent) was employed as a miner by Homestake Mining Company of California (Homestake). During his new hire probation period he was injured on the job,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API