Legal Opinion

Bird v. Port Byron Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and application granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying claimant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim {see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]). Respondent "acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim” shortly after their occurrence (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; see, Maurice W. v Onondaga County Dept. of Social Servs., 186 AD2d 986, 987; Pepe v Somers Cent. School Dist., 108 AD2d 799, 800). The injury to claimant’s daughter occurred between classes in the hallway of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Groff v. Bethlehem Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Pepe v. Somers Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Urban v. Waterford-Halfmoon Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Maurice W. v. Onondaga County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Padovano v. Massapequa Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Trotman v. Rochester City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API