Legal Opinion

Township of Ridley v. Blanchette

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-2113PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FOGEL, District Judge.

Before us are cross motions for summary judgment which present the question of plaintiffs’ right to enjoin defendants from constructing, and thereafter using a crossover on the railroad line running from Westehester-Media, Pennsylvania, through Ridley Township to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A prior request for a temporary restraining order was denied because of plaintiffs’ failure to establish the necessary criteria for the grant of that extraordinary remedy, and consequently construction continued, notwithstanding the pendency of this action. 1

The…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Movant-Appellant v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Concord Township v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Joseph v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  5. Strasburg Associates v. Newlin TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API