Lewinski v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge McGINLEY.
Michael and Lauri Lewinski, individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, Heather Lewinski (Petitioners), filed a complaint against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (CAT Fund), and its Director, John Reed, 1 for declaratory judgment in this Court’s original jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 761. 2 The Petitioners seek a declaration from this Court that the CAT Fund’s refusal to provide coverage on behalf of a professional corporation violates: (1) the former Health Care Services Malpractice Act, 40…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Geriot v. Council of BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tracie Peloquin, as Administratrix of the Estate of Pearl E. Archambault v. Haven Health Center of Greenville, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Anderson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Korczakowski v. Hwan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2004