Legal Opinion

Lewinski v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

Michael and Lauri Lewinski, individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, Heather Lewinski (Petitioners), filed a complaint against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (CAT Fund), and its Director, John Reed, 1 for declaratory judgment in this Court’s original jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 761. 2 The Petitioners seek a declaration from this Court that the CAT Fund’s refusal to provide coverage on behalf of a professional corporation violates: (1) the former Health Care Services Malpractice Act, 40…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Geriot v. Council of BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tracie Peloquin, as Administratrix of the Estate of Pearl E. Archambault v. Haven Health Center of Greenville, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  2. Anderson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Korczakowski v. Hwan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API