Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sherman v. Boston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 2016No. 14-14-00764-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

I join Parts I and II of the majority opinion, but I respectfully dissent to Part III.

After a three-day bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of a limited liability company on its conversion counterclaim. The plaintiff, a natural person represented by counsel, offered about half of the evidence admitted. There were no opening statements or closing arguments at trial. No one purported to submit documents to the trial court on behalf of the company during the trial, and no one presented arguments to the trial court in support of the company’s claims. Though the company was not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mansions in the Forest, L.P. v. Montgomery CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. KSNG Architects, Inc. v. Beasley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Bennie v. Triangle Ranch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Rabb International, Inc. v. SHL Thai Food Service, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API