Legal Opinion
Gallman v. Martin
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 21, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
James Gallman (Gallman) appeals, pro se, from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer County (trial court) which dismissed Gallman’s complaint for lack of proper service pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No. 422 and Fischer v. Kassab, 21 Pa. D. & C.3d. 278 (1981). 1 The trial court further found that if the trial court did have personal jurisdiction it still lacked subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Logan v. Horn, 692 A.2d 1157 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997). 2 We affirm the decision of the trial court.
The present controversy began with a complaint filed by Gallman in our…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winsett v. McGinnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Anderson Et Al. v. WinsettSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Smith & McMaster, P.C. v. Newtown BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Auberzinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Logan v. HornCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Philadelphia Water Revenue Bureau v. Towanda Properties, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- ECI, LLC. v. Campisi Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021