Legal Opinion

Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Bird

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1917No. 8590PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

Appellee, as executrix, recovered a judgment for the sum of $3,500 as damages for the death of her husband, Joseph Bird. The trial and judgment was under the federal Employers’ Liability Act of April 22, 1908 (35 Stat. at L. 65, c. 149 [Comp. Stat. 1916, § 8657]). Both by exception to the petition upon which the trial proceeded and by plea, the appellant presented the two-year statute of limitation prescribed by the act referred to, and whether this plea was well taken is the vital question presented on this appeal.

Upon the original institution of the suit, which was on March 21, 1913, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Phoenix Lumber Co. v. Houston Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. Norfolk-Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Bird v. Ft. Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lammars v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API