Legal Opinion

Mendelson v. Empire Associates Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs motion to “clarify” is properly deemed one to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable. Were we to consider the merits, we would affirm on the same grounds as we affirm the balance of the order on appeal.

In a prior order (278 AD2d 40 [2000]), we affirmed the striking of an award of treble damages, but also agreed not to vacate the award of interest to plaintiff. In the present appeal, we consider whether the court improvidently limited the amount of prejudgment interest plaintiff could recover due to delay in entering the corrected judgment, namely, to the period between the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peerless Insurance v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Jackson v. BrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Macy's Inc. v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API