Legal Opinion
Beekman v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 4, 1979PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs are firemen who were retired due to disability. At the time of their retirement, they were required to retire *318immediately and were not given allowance for earned terminal leave and accrued vacation time. This policy was instituted by the City of New York in 1975. Litigation was instituted resulting in a determination that disabled firemen could not be forced into immediate retirement but rather must be allowed to take earned terminal leave and accrued vacation time before the effective date of retirement (Matter of City of New York v Vizzini, NYLJ, Aug. 11,…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rivera v. TrimarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
4Cited by14 opinions
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Ammon v. Suffolk CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Walker v. BuscagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Suffolk Housing Services v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Tosner v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.