Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Minnesota Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs and by intervening creditors of the defendant corporation from a judgment of the district court for Wabasha county, and from an order by Start, J., (before whom the action was tried, without a jury,) refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

On August 16,1883, the defendant elevator company became incorporated in form under the provisions of chapter 11, Laws 1873, now found from sections 120-143, inclusive, title 2, c. 34, Gen. St. 1878. Upon the 2d day of September, 1884, it assigned all of its property for the benefit of its creditors, in the manner prescribed by chapter 148, Laws 1881. The assignee named in the deed of assignment accepted, took possession of the assets, and entered upon the discharge of his duties. Early in the year 1885, the original plaintiffs herein commenced this action, which is, according to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New Lamp Chimney Co. v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. The Ocean National Bank v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Young v. RosenbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Allen v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Jones v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Arthur v. WilliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. First National Bank v. Winona Plow Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Oswald v. St. Paul Globe Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Way v. BarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API