Legal Opinion

Peoples Bank v. Dorsey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1996No. 03881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:

This dispute arises out of a mortgage foreclosure action. Appellant Dorothea Dorsey claims that she did not receive adequate notice of her default under the Commonwealth’s statutes and rules of court. We find no merit to Dorsey’s claims and, therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order denying her petition to open and/or strike the default judgment.

On October 27, 1992, Sears Mortgage Corporation notified Dorothea Dorsey that the mortgage it held on her property was in serious default due to Dorsey’s failure to make her monthly payments in July, August,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manor Building Corp. v. Manor Complex Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Continental Bank v. RappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Triffin v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Keystone Bank v. Flooring Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In Re TownsvilleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Crum v. F.L. Shaffer Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Willits v. FryerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Sun West Mortgage v. Sanders, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API