Legal Opinion

Coe v. Errol

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition, for the abatement of taxes. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

The petitioner, a resident of Bangor, Me., asks for an abatement of the taxes assessed by the defendant town in April, 1880, and in April, 1881, upon a lot of logs therein, of the value of some $6,000, which had been cut and drawn there during the preceding winters from Wentworth’s Location in this state, and which were owned by himself and other non-residents. It is alleged in the petition and admitted to be true, that at the time the assessments were made the “ logs were being taken by the owners on the way to Maine, to be manufactured and sold;” and the claim of the petitioner is, that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Pervear v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Hoyt v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Catlin v. HullSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Auclair Transportation, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Dresser v. HopkintonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API