Coe v. Errol
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Petition, for the abatement of taxes. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.
The petitioner, a resident of Bangor, Me., asks for an abatement of the taxes assessed by the defendant town in April, 1880, and in April, 1881, upon a lot of logs therein, of the value of some $6,000, which had been cut and drawn there during the preceding winters from Wentworth’s Location in this state, and which were owned by himself and other non-residents. It is alleged in the petition and admitted to be true, that at the time the assessments were made the “ logs were being taken by the owners on the way to Maine, to be manufactured and sold;” and the claim of the petitioner is, that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Pervear v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hoyt v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Catlin v. HullSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Auclair Transportation, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Dresser v. HopkintonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908