Cichecki v. City of Hamtramck
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtT. G-. Kavanagh, J.
The facts of this workmen’s compensation claim are not in dispute. Edmund Cichecki was a policeman for the city of Hamtramck. He died January 3, 1965 from an acute myocardial infarction and left a widow and six minor children. The widow applied for and was awarded a pension from the city of Hamtramck which amounted to 1/2 of the deceased’s base pay. By a later resolution of the city council, the amount o.f the pension was matched by an equal payment by the city.
Subsequently she applied for workmen’s compensation, but later amended her claim to remove herself as a claimant and added her six…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hansen-Snyder Co. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Gibson v. DymonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Modern Globe, Inc. v. 1425 Lake Drive Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by19 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. ColganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Franks v. White Pine Copper Division, Copper Range Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bannan v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Guardian Industries Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Johnson v. City of MuskegonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.