Arata v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District

Plaintiffs principal attack is that the stadium district’s bond resolution and the acts executed in response thereto are unconstitutional, being contrary to the provisions of Paragraph (S) of the constitutional amendment which created the district (Art. 14, Sec. 47), because the transaction pledges the faith and credit of the State for that district’s bonds.

We have held that the resolutions of such districts, subdivisions, and boards of this state are considered to be in parity *619with the ordinances of municipalities and parishes for the purpose of determining the applicability of Article 7,…