Legal Opinion

Mission1st Group, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 29, 2019No. 19-332Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims BID PROTEST No. 19-332C (Filed Under Seal: July 15, 2019 | Reissued: July 29, 2019) ∗ ) Keywords: Bid Protest; IDIQ; U.S. Army; MISSION1ST GROUP, INC., ) Cost Realism Analysis; FAR 15.404-1; ) Probable Cost Adjustment; Clarification; Plaintiff, ) Clerical Error ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant, ) ) Justin A. Chiarodo, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Adam Proujansky and Stephanie Harden, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC, Of Counsel. Matthew Roche, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API