(PC) McMillan v. Ringler

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Edwin McMillan, No. 2:13-cv-00578-KJM-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 S. Ringler, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Defendants Ringler, Scotland, and Zuniga apply ex parte for leave to contend that plaintiff 18 | Edwin McMillan did not exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this action, as required 19 | by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). See Ex Parte App., ECF No. 178; 42 U.S.C. 20 | § 1997e(a). 21 A defendant bears the burden to both plead and prove that a plaintiff has not exhausted…