Legal Opinion

Walter P. Cravens v. Fred B. McKinnell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1966No. 18137_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Chief Judge.

Defendants-appellants appeal from a judgment of $44,852.22 plus interest rendered in favor of Fred B. MeKinnell, plaintiff-appellee, on an account stated theory. This cause of action arose out of an apparently unsuccessful cemetery development venture initially entered into by appellant Walter P. Cravens and ap-pellee. We affirm.

To determine this appeal, it is not necessary to extensively set forth all of the facts developed before the District Court. A brief summary will suffice. In 1955 appellee and appellant Cravens proceeded to develop the cemetery involved under an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harry Ashley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. PeltsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Geer-Melkus Construction Co. v. United States ex rel. Bison Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Appalachian Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Appalachian Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, and Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API