Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. Jessup & Sons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 20, 1931No. 21020PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. In a proceeding to foreclose a chattel mortgage, the mortgagor may by affidavit of illegality avail himself of any defense which he might set up in an ordinary .suit upon the demand secured by the mortgage, and which goes to show that the amount claimed is not due and owing; and while the mortgagor is thus permitted to avail himself of a valid defense by way of recoupment, he is not entitled to plead the defense of set-off in such a summary proceeding, since the latter defense is not one which goes to the justice of plaintiff’s demand. Arnold v. Carter, 125 Ga. 319 (54 S. E. 177) ; Mahone…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Culver v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Mahone v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlas Auto Finance Company v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. General Acceptance Corp. v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Glass v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Helton v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Holleman v. Commercial Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API