Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Calloway

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1987No. 86-SC-976-DGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

The question is whether the failure of the Commonwealth to locate and produce at trial a potential witness for the defendant constitutes or mandates a reversal of a conviction.

The respondent was convicted of the offense of trafficking in a controlled substance. In a pretrial discovery motion, respondent requested the names of witnesses to the crime. On July 11, 1984, in response, the Commonwealth stated:

“James Morris may be an eyewitness to one or more of the acts contained in the indictment. His address is unknown, but he will be made available at trial by the Commonwealth.”

Jam…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sykes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Anderson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API