Legal Opinion
Bridges v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 8, 2000No. 3D99-2220Published
1Opinion of the Court
*783 CONFESSION OF ERROR
2Per curiam
Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the denial of defendant’s 3.800 motion and remand for resentencing. See Wick v. State, 651 So.2d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(combination of probation and prison term must not exceed statutory maximum); see also Martell v. State, 676 So.2d 1030, 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(Rule 3.850, not Rule 3.800 is “the proper means to challenge a court’s failure to order a presentence investigation”).
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Martell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Wick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995