Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Grigsby v. Stokes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1930No. 19128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

This was an action involving a proceeding to restrain or prevent the sale of premises under execution. The ground of objection ⅛ that the property levied on under the execution was a homestead. The parties here on appeal occupy the same position as they occupied in the trial court. The essential facts are as follows:

The defendants S. D. Stokes and Mrs. S. I>. Stokes signed "a supersedeas bond in a criminal action wherein their son was convicted of a felony. The bond was executed in Cleveland county, but the defendants in error reside in Pottawatomie county, and upon a certain tract of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas Land & Loan Co. v. BlalockTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wootton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Williams v. SwetlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  4. Farmers' State Bank of Quanah v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Klenk v. KnobleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilpatrick v. HatterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Farnsworth v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Biglane v. RawlesMississippi Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API