Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fox

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 15, 1886Published

1Opinion of the Court

McAdam, Ch. J.

Interest upon interest, or compound interest, is not allowable, except in special cases (see authorities collated in 4 Abb. New Dig. 12, §§ 155, 156, 161). The plaintiffs may be allowed simple interest, which on their demand aggregates $487.89, and way credit the defendant with simple interest, which, on his payments, aggregates $250.33, leaving abalance of interest amounting to $237.06 due them. If the plaintiffs do not assent to this, they must follow the rule in regard to the effect of partial payments laid down by the supreme court of the State in a number of cases which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State of Connecticut v.JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Smith, Twogood & Co. v. Coopers & ClarkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. Markel's Administrator v. Spitler's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Whittacre v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
  5. Williams v. HoughtalingNew York Supreme Court · 1824

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API