Legal Opinion
Langsam v. Terraciano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered June 30, 2004, which, inter alia, upon renewal, granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint to assert a cause of action for lack of informed consent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A cataract was removed from plaintiff Sol Langsam’s eye by defendant doctor Terraciano on January 18, 2001. Terraciano’s deposition testimony established that he saw Langsam on nine occasions during the ensuing year, the last of which occurred on January 2, 2002. During this period, Terraciano treated Langsam for two conditions allegedly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pace v. CaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Oksman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chestnut v. Bobb-McKoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hill v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Hill v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Salerno v. Huntington Hospital Dolan Family Health Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Salerno v. Huntington Hospital Dolan Family Health Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012