Legal Opinion
Chambers v. Toohey
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 28, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeeskie, J.
Is the relator, an employe, entitled to participate in the fund (one per cent.) created by virtue of chapter 74, Pamph. L. 1919, p. 138; Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. 1911-1924, p. 352, § 34-317, amended by chapter 81, Pamph. L. *7811923, p. 162; Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. 1911-1924, p. 3904, § **236-92, and chapter 55, Pamph. L. 1936, p. 145; N. J. Stat. Annual 1936, § **236-92 (1) ?
The facts are stipulated. On October 3d, 1929, relator was employed by one August Soffel, at Colt’s Neck, New Jersey, and lost the sight of his right eye; it was a compensable accident. Some fifteen or eighteen years prior…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmid v. Stanton Forging Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Mayor of Jersey v. BorstSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Addotta v. BluntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Clarkson v. LeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Wittes v. RepkoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warner Lambert Co. v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
- McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Richardson v. Essex National Trunk, C., Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Hannan v. Employers Commercial Union Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Walker v. AlbrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938