Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1989No. F-87-965Published

1Dissent

PARKS, Vice Presiding Judge,

dissenting:

The majority today sounds the death knell to the proposition that article II, section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution may, under some circumstances, grant an accused broader protection than the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The majority overrules prior cases to the contrary. Because I disagree with such a position under the limited circumstances of this case, I dissent.

Appellant argues that admission of his refusal to take a breathalyzer test violated his right against self-incrimination under article II, section 21 of the Oklahoma…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Turner v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. State v. ThomasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API