Legal Opinion

Paul B. Episcoped, Ltd. v. Law Offices of Campbell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 2007No. 1-05-2329PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE ROBERT E. GORDON

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs, attorneys Paul Episcope and John Erb and the Episcope law firm, sued defendant attorneys to recover fees under a fee-splitting agreement. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that their representation agreement (agreement) with defendants, Anthony Di Vincenzo and Richard Campbell and their law partnership, and the parties’ mutual client, Havoco of America, Ltd. (client), applies to more than one case. The lawyers agreed in writing to represent the client jointly and orally to split fees in the client’s federal lawsuit…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Quake Construction, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Air Safety, Inc. v. Teachers Realty Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC v. Peerless Network, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  2. Doornbos Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. SchlenkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Hensley Construction, LLC v. Pulte Home Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Ferris, Thompson, & Zweig, Ltd. v. EspositoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. Thompson v. Gordon - Supplemental Filed 02/03/10Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API