Legal Opinion

State v. Ulibarri

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1922No. 2629PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

RAYNOLDS, C. J.

Appellant was indicted and convicted of the larceny of three cattle. From said conviction and sentence thereon he appeals to this court.

Appellant assigns as error the action of the trial court in denying his motion for an instructed verdict of acquittal at the close of the state’s case. We think this assignment is without merit. The record discloses that there was substantial evidence, at the time the motion for a directed verdict was made, to support the verdict.

“As a general rule the court should not direct a verdict of acquittal where there is any…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CarabajalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. GravesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. YbarraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. MosleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Kilpatrick v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API