Legal Opinion

Zeidman v. Davis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1929No. 3503PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, J. ,

The suit was filed June 20, 1927.

Plaintiff contends that time is not of the essence of the contract and upon equitable principles she is entitled to have specific performance if she is able to present a good title at any time before the decree is pronounced in the case; that under the facts she was able to present a good title prior to ■ the pronouncement of the decree by the trial court. This right •asuo uoatS aqq. jo s^ouj aq^ Áq poqoijuoo sr Time may be made the essence of the contract by the parties, an unreasonable time may elapse, or circumstance arise to prejudice the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hermansen v. SlatterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Domigan v. DomiganOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API