Legal Opinion

Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 3, 1939No. 6977PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

-The defendants in an action for treble damages under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act § 7, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, note, have appealed from an order of the court below made under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for the discovery and production by them of documents for inspection,copying and photographing by the plaintiff for use at the trial of the action. An order of this nature is interlocutory and, therefore, not appealable. This has been expressly decided by the Supreme Court in the cases of Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221, 49 S.Ct. 118, 73 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Union Tool Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Borden Company v. William Sylk and Harry S. Sylk v. Penrose Industries Corporation Sylvan Seal Milk, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. American Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Hartley Pen Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  5. L. Gilbert Cohen v. Curtis Publishing Company, Curtis Circulation Company, Cowles Magazines, Inc., and the Hearst CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API