Legal Opinion

Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided July 24, 2024No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTIONS FOR OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., SANCTIONS Defendant. BACKGROUND On July 26, 2023, defendant, Omega Liner Company, Inc., filed a motion to compel plaintiff, Buergofol GmbH, to produce documents and respond to an interrogatory. See Docket 175. Buergofol filed a brief in opposition to Omega’s motion. See Docket 195. Based on the content of Buergofol’s opposition, Omega moves to strike Buergofol’s response, claiming it makes personal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property ImprovementCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API