Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentLewis, J.
I respectfully dissent because I would conclude that the plain and ordinary language of the TDT statute requires the tax to be levied on the full consideration charged by an OTC that uses the merchant model business plan.2 The statute straightforwardly provides that the “[t]ax shall be due on the consideration paid for occupancy....” § 125.0104(3)(a)2.a., Fla. Stat. (2014). Additionally, the statute directs that “[t]he tourist development tax shall be levied, imposed, and set ... at a rate of 1 percent or 2 percent of each dollar and major fraction of each dollar of the total consideration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fl. Dept. of Rev. v. FL. MUN. POWER AGENCYSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Gray v. Central Florida Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Expedia, Inc. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Bancroft Investment Corp. v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- LEON CO. EDUC. AUTH. v. HartsfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.