Legal Opinion

State v. Diaz

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1983No. 6055PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

From convictions for commercial burglary and larceny of property, defendant appeals raising two points:

1. Did the prosecutor’s comments during closing- argument deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial?

2. Did defendant receive ineffective assistance of counsel?

Because of the disposition under the first point, we do not reach the second issue.

The prosecutor made the comments complained of during closing argument, primarily during the State’s rebuttal. In his opening summation the prosecutor made references to the credibility of a co-defendant, James Marquez, who pled…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. RuffinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. DayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. SwavolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API