Legal Opinion

Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 3, 1968No. Nos. 20961, 21274PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURGER, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by Consolidated Nine, Inc. and Comint Corporation from an opinion and order of the Federal Communications Commission which denied an application for interim operating authority and granted authority to Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor here, to continue the operation of channel 9 pending resolution of a new comparative hearing before the Commission. Consolidated Nine is an open-end joint group in which four of the contending applicants have joined to propose a joint interim operation of the facility. This is spelled out more fully later.

In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  5. American Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Comint Corporation and Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenors. Comint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API