Joe Di Lisio and Cristina Di Lisio, Husband and Wife v. Steve P. Vidal, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of New Mexico
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Chief Judge.
The question for decision is whether certain gain was subject to tax as income derived from the sale of capital assets or as ordinary income. In their income tax returns for 1949 and 1950, Joe De Lisio and Cristina De Lisio, husband and wife, returned as capital gain income derived from the sale of certain lots in Raton, New Mexico. Representatives of the Bureau of Internal Revenue determined that the gain represented ordinary income. A deficiency in tax for each year followed. The tax with accrued interest was paid. Claims for refund were seasonably filed. No action was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MAULDIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Home Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Friend v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Victory Housing No. 2, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walter H. Kaltreider and Irene C. Kaltreider v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Victor Lee Coffey, Sr., and Margaret H. Coffey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Bert Crosswhite and Virginia Crosswhite v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Cicero I. Murray and Olive B. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.