Legal Opinion

St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. McDavitt Bros.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Cameron County Court; E. H. Goodrich, Judge. Action by McDavitt Bros, against the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Company, which impleaded one E. D. Dawson. From a.judgment for plaintiffs against the railroad company, with recovery over by the company against Dawson, the railroad company and Dawson appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

Appellees sued appellant to recover the value of certain sorghum seed alleged to have been shipped by appellees from Dallas, Tex., to E. Eriedlander, at Mission, Tex. It was alleged that appellant converted the seed “to its own use and benefit, instead of delivering said seed to E. Friedlander, or his order, as it was in duty bound to do; it delivered the same to one E. D. Dawson, without the knowledge or consent of this plaintiff, and without the order, knowledge, or consent of ■ the said E. Eriedlander; because of which said sorghum seed were wholly lost to this plaintiff, to his damage in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Grayson County National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Halff, Weiss & Co. v. Chas. H. Allyn & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gideon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API